If I had a nickel for every time Saul Olyan uses the word "stigmatize" and its cognates in Disability in the Hebrew Bible, I would have been rich by the end of this slim volume. Well, maybe not rich, but I would have had a lot of nickels. The lingo of the Ivory Tower permeates the book, and it impedes Olyan's ability to evaluate constructively the language, imagery, stories, and laws surrounding persons with disabilities in the Hebrew Bible.
Olyan sets out to "reconstruct the Hebrew Bible's particular ideas of what is disabling and the potential social ramifications of those ideas," and he does so with the assumption that disability is "largely if not exclusively a social construction designed to exclude and exert power." Olyan is not alone in his assumption; scholars within the field of disability studies generally assume that disability is a concept not grounded in reality but grounded in unfortunate notions of what constitutes "the norm."
I'm sympathetic to this position. For instance, most people think of deafness as a disability. But consider a small island community in which fifty percent of the inhabitants have inherited a gene causing deafness. In order for everyday life to happen on that island, everyone—those who can hear and those who cannot—needs to know sign language. Because deafness is considered an acceptable version of normal, it is no longer disabling. Or consider my friend Jessica. She graduated from the University of Richmond as a Cigna scholar. She lives in an apartment in Old Town, Alexandria. She drives herself to her job at a government agency, and she is now working on her MBA. She has traveled to Europe. She has also endured fifteen operations and walks with canes, due to cerebral palsy. Although there are limitations on her abilities (walking on ice, for instance, is more treacherous for her than for me), due to medical advances and structural accommodations to buildings and walkways, her experience of life is akin to that of any other twentysomething professional in the United States. In many ways, especially in our culture, disability is a social construct, and it is important to expose it as such. But it is unhelpful to take this modern critique of the concept of disability, superimpose it upon biblical texts, and conclude, in Olyan's words, that biblical writers "create categories of stigmatized persons whom they seek to marginalize as well as their antitype."


4 comments:
Interesting review. I'm only at the early stages of my research into disability and the Christian churches - but even at the beginning of my reading into Biblical representations of disability, it's clear that this is a complex issue. As a disabled Christian, I'd rather grapple with these complex representations than have them explained away too easily.
That said, I am committed to the concept of disability as oppression. I see and experience it daily, not just in secular society, but (and sometimes more) in the churches. I believe theology is at the heart of the oppression I face as a disabled person in the church. I'm just beginning to work out what that might mean, about thirty years in my journey as a disabled Christian. I'm appreciating the questions as much as the answers.
Naomi, Thanks for your comments, and I hope you'll check in and share some further thoughts and insights along the way. I don't know how long you've been reading this blog, but for me the most helpful distinction is one between limitedness (constitutive of our God-given humanity) and brokenness (which comes as a result of the fall and the intrusion of sin into the world). I have a post from last month on the topic called "The Curses of Brokenness, the Blessings of Limitations": http://amyjuliabecker.blogspot.com/2010/02/curses-of-brokenness-blessings-of.html
Thanks for your response, Amy Julia, and for the lovely welcome to your blog. I've been reading a few months, but haven't had the courage to say much until now!
The older post you linked to is very much along my lines of thinking - thanks for the link. The paradoxes of disability (and theology about it) are the most difficult and yet the most interesting things about it, and a big reason why I'm interested in researching it. My work so far has been particularly focused on diversity, with oppression related to that - but the issues of limitation and brokenness that you identify are all related to that.
- Naomi (signing in from my 'other', non-research-related blog)
Naomi,
I do hope you'll chime in on this blog whenever you have something to say! And I'm curious to know more about your research. In particular, are you researching both physical and mental disability?
Thanks,
Amy Julia
Post a Comment